Problem-solving is an essential aspect of any successful manufacturing process, and Toyota has long been recognized as a leader in this area. One of the key tools in Toyota's problem-solving arsenal is the "5 Why" technique. This simple yet powerful method is used to identify the root causes of problems by repeatedly asking the question "Why?" until the underlying issue is revealed. In this blog, we will explore the origins of the 5 Why concept, delve into how Toyota implements it in their factories, and examine the impacts of each step on their manufacturing processes.

HISTORY AND ORIGIN OF 5 WHY METHOD 

The 5 Why technique was developed in the 1930s by Sakichi Toyoda, the founder of Toyota Industries. Initially used within Toyota’s manufacturing processes, it became a critical component of its problem-solving culture and later, a cornerstone of the Lean manufacturing philosophy. The method is based on the principle that problems can be solved by tracing their root causes through successive questioning, typically five times.

CONCEPT & PROCESS

The 5 Why technique is based on the idea that behind every problem lies a chain of cause-and-effect relationships. By asking "Why?" repeatedly, you can trace these relationships back to the root cause. Typically, five iterations are enough to uncover the core issue, although more or fewer questions may be needed depending on the complexity of the problem. The goal is not just to fix the symptoms but to address the underlying causes that, if left unresolved, could lead to the recurrence of the problem.

HOW THE 5 WHY METHOD WORKS?

Toyota uses the 5 Why technique as part of its broader commitment to continuous improvement, known as Kaizen. When a problem arises on the production line, the team immediately engages in the 5 Why analysis to identify root cause. The process is collaborative, involving frontline workers, supervisors, and engineers. Here's how Toyota implements each step of the 5 Why process:

Identify the Problem: The first step in Toyota’s 5 Why technique is to clearly define the problem. This is crucial because a well-defined problem statement ensures that everyone involved understands exactly what needs to be addressed. 

For example, if a machine stops working, the problem is simply stated as, "The machine has stopped." This clarity helps in focusing the investigation on the specific issue at hand, avoiding any ambiguity that might lead to misdirection.

 1. Ask the First Why: After identifying the problem, the team asks the first "Why?" to uncover the immediate cause. 

For example, when the machine stops, the first question might be, "Why did the machine stop?" The answer could be, "Because the circuit has overloaded." This response identifies a direct and obvious cause of the problem. However, while this answer points to what went wrong, it’s not sufficient to stop here because it only addresses the surface-level issue, not the deeper root cause.

 2. Ask the Second Why: The second "Why?" digs deeper into the cause identified in the first step. The team might ask, "Why did the circuit overload?" The answer could be, "Because the machine was running without adequate lubrication." This step reveals more about the technical issues that led to the circuit overload. By asking this second question, Toyota’s team begins to move beyond the immediate symptom (the overloaded circuit) and starts to explore underlying factors that contributed to the problem, setting the stage for a more thorough analysis.

 3. Ask the Third Why: The third "Why?" continues to probe deeper into the factors contributing to the problem. The team asks, "Why was the machine running without adequate lubrication?" The answer might be, "Because the lubrication pump was not functioning properly." This reveals a deeper issue related to equipment functionality and maintenance. At this stage, the investigation uncovers that the problem is not just about the circuit or the lubrication but also about the equipment that supports these processes. This step highlights potential lapses in equipment maintenance or oversight.

 4. Ask the Fourth Why: The team then asks, "Why was the lubrication pump not functioning properly?" The answer might be, "Because it was not regularly inspected." Now, the investigation is uncovering procedural or human errors.

 5. Ask the Fifth Why: Finally, the team asks, "Why was the lubrication pump not regularly inspected?" The answer might be, "Because there is no maintenance schedule in place for the lubrication system." This final step reveals deeper organizational or procedural flaws, such as inadequate maintenance protocols. By uncovering such systemic issues, Toyota can implement solutions that not only fix the immediate problem but also prevent similar issues from recurring in the future.

HOW TOYOTA USES THE 5 WHY METHOD?

1. Identify the Problem

This initial step is about accurately defining the problem that has occurred, without assuming the causes. It could be a quality defect, operational inefficiency, or equipment failure. The focus is on specifying the problem in measurable terms, such as a specific increase in defect rates or unexpected machine stoppages. The team documents the issue in detail, noting when and where it occurred, which helps in tracking and referencing during the analysis.

Example: If a paint defect is identified in a car model, the problem would be specified as, "30% of model X cars inspected on March 25 have paint bubbling on the hood."

2. Ask the First Why

The initial "Why" seeks to understand the immediate reason behind the identified problem. This step avoids making assumptions by relying on direct observations or factual evidence from the production floor.

Example: "Why is the paint bubbling?" The first response might be, "The paint did not adhere properly to the surface."

3. Ask Subsequent Whys

The subsequent "Whys" dig deeper into each answer provided until the root cause is uncovered. This involves challenging each response with a further "Why" to peel back the layers of symptoms and reach the underlying issues.

Example:

• Second Why: "Why did the paint not adhere properly?"
• Answer: "The primer application was uneven."
• Third Why: "Why was the primer application uneven?"
• Answer: "The spraying equipment was malfunctioning."
• Fourth Why: "Why was the spraying equipment malfunctioning?"
• Answer: "The equipment was overdue for maintenance."
• Fifth Why: "Why was the equipment overdue for maintenance?"
• Answer: "The maintenance schedule was not followed."

4. Determine the Root Cause

In Toyota's system, determining the root cause is a rigorous process that involves multiple team members and utilizes systematic approaches to ensure that the real underlying issue is identified. Here's how they typically handle this crucial step:

Team Collaboration

• Cross-Functional Teams: Toyota forms cross-functional teams to address the issue. These teams usually consist of personnel from different departments such as engineering, production, quality control, and maintenance.
• Problem-Solving Meetings: The team holds structured problem-solving meetings where they use the information gathered from the initial "5 Whys" analysis to delve deeper into each response.

Methodologies Used

• Fishbone Diagrams: Also known as cause-and-effect diagrams, these are frequently employed to visually organize the potential causes. Team members contribute by identifying and categorizing possible reasons for the failure based on categories such as methods, machines, people, materials, measurement, and environment.
• Pareto Analysis: This technique helps in identifying the most significant causes contributing to the problem, allowing the team to prioritize their efforts on the most impactful issues.
• Root Cause Analysis (RCA): RCA is a collective term for various methodologies, including the "5 Whys," that focus on uncovering the fundamental cause of a problem. The team iterates on each 'why' until no further underlying levels can be identified.

Discussion and Decision-Making

• Documentation: All discussions and findings are thoroughly documented. This includes detailed descriptions of the problem, the analysis process, the identified causes, and the rationale behind each decision.
• Validation: Before finalizing the root cause, the team validates their findings. This might involve revisiting the production area, conducting experiments, or simulating conditions to confirm that addressing the identified cause would prevent the issue.
• Consensus Building: It's crucial that all members agree on the root cause. This consensus ensures that the solutions implemented will be supported and adhered to by everyone involved.

Tools and Technologies

• Data Analysis Software: Advanced data analytics tools are used to manage and analyze large datasets if the problem is complex and data-driven.
• Collaboration Tools: Software like Microsoft Teams or Slack may be used for communication and to maintain a central repository of documents and meeting notes accessible to all team members.

By engaging in these detailed discussions and using structured methodologies, Toyota ensures that the root cause identified is the true source of the problem, paving the way for effective corrective actions. This systematic approach not only resolves the immediate issue but also enhances the reliability and efficiency of their production processes.

5. Implement Solutions

When implementing solutions to prevent the recurrence of issues like a missing template in Toyota's factories, the focus is on creating robust systems that enhance operational efficiency and reduce human error. Here’s how each suggested solution can be elaborated upon and implemented in more depth:

1. Checklist System

Development and Design of the Checklist

• Tailored Checklists: Checklists are specifically tailored for each workstation and task. This involves detailed analysis of the tasks performed at each station to determine what tools, materials, and documents are required.
• Collaboration: Teams comprising floor managers, experienced workers, and quality assurance personnel collaborate to develop these checklists. The development process may include workflow analysis and task decomposition to ensure no item is overlooked.

Implementation and Daily Use

• Digital Integration: Ideally, checklists are integrated into digital systems accessible via tablets or computers at each workstation. This allows for real-time updates and tracking.
• Start-of-Shift Checks: At the beginning of each shift, workers are required to complete the checklist. This involves physically verifying the presence and readiness of each item on the list before starting their tasks.
• End-of-Shift Checks: Similar checks are done at the end of shifts to ensure that all tools and materials are accounted for and stored properly, ready for the next shift.

Discussion and Method Selection

• Regular Meetings: Teams hold regular meetings to discuss the effectiveness of the checklists and any changes in the production line that might necessitate updates to the checklists.
• Feedback Mechanism: Workers are encouraged to provide feedback on the checklist’s adequacy and usability. This feedback is often gathered through digital platforms where workers can note any discrepancies or suggest improvements.
• Continuous Improvement: Leveraging the principle of Kaizen, or continuous improvement, the checklist system is regularly reviewed for any potential refinements. Changes may be made to streamline the checklist or adjust it for new tools or processes introduced into the production environment.

Technology and Tools Used

• RFID and Barcoding: For higher accountability and easier tracking, items on the checklist might be tagged with RFID chips or barcodes. Workers would scan these tags to confirm the presence and status of each item.
• Software Solutions: Inventory and workflow management software are often used to manage the checklist system. This software can alert managers if items are missing or if a checklist was not completed properly.

Example: An assembly line worker would have a checklist on a digital device listing all necessary items. Before starting their shift, they must go through the checklist, ensuring everything is in place and checking off each item digitally, which is recorded in the system for compliance monitoring.

2. Training Sessions

• Regular Training Programs: Organize periodic training sessions that reinforce the importance of workplace organization and readiness. Use real-life scenarios and data from past incidents to show the impact of preparedness on productivity and quality.
• Interactive Modules: Develop interactive training modules that simulate the start-up process at workstations, requiring workers to identify missing tools or templates as part of the training.
• Feedback Incorporation: Allow employees to provide feedback on training effectiveness and suggestions for improvement, ensuring that training remains relevant and effective.

Example: Training sessions could include a virtual reality setup where employees experience a simulated workstation setup. They would be required to identify missing items and understand the consequences of starting work without complete readiness.

3. Adjusting Procedures

• Real-Time Tracking: Implement RFID tags or barcodes on all tools and templates. Use scanners at each workstation to ensure all necessary items are accounted for before work begins.
• Management Software: Utilize inventory management software to keep real-time tabs on the location and status of all tools and templates. This system alerts supervisors if any item is not returned to its designated place.
• Responsibility Assignment: Assign specific responsibilities to staff for checking and maintaining the inventory of tools and templates. Regular training and updates should be provided to these staff members to handle their duties effectively.

Example: Each template could have an RFID tag. When a worker scans the template at their station, the system checks it off the list. If a template is missing, the system immediately alerts the supervisor and shows the last known location to help quickly resolve the issue.

By enhancing these implementation steps, Toyota can further solidify its operations, reducing the likelihood of errors and increasing overall operational efficiency and reliability. Each solution not only addresses the immediate problem but also contributes to a culture of continuous improvement and accountability.

6. Monitor the Results and Standardize

After implementing the solutions, Toyota closely monitors the outcomes to ensure the effectiveness of the actions taken. If successful, these new practices are standardized and documented as part of the official procedures to prevent future occurrences.

Example: After implementing the automated alert system, track the performance of the equipment and the occurrence of related defects. If defects decrease and equipment performance stabilizes, standardize the use of the alert system across all similar equipment in the factory.

IMPACT OF EACH STEP IMPLEMENTED BY TOYOTA

Each step of the 5 Why process at Toyota has a significant impact on their operations:

• Identifying the Problem ensures that the team is focused and aligned on what needs to be solved. This clarity prevents wasted effort on irrelevant issues and ensures that resources are allocated efficiently. It also creates a common understanding, which is essential for effective teamwork and problem-solving.
• Asking the First and Second Whys allows the team to uncover immediate technical issues and can implement quick fixes that restore functionality, allowing production to resume while further investigation continues. These early solutions are critical for minimizing downtime and maintaining productivity in the short term.
• Asking the Third and Fourth Whys digs deeper into operational practices, such as maintenance routines or worker training. These steps help enhance overall equipment reliability and performance, reducing the likelihood of similar issues arising in the future.
• Asking the Fifth Why typically exposes systemic problems, such as gaps in procedures or policies. By addressing these root causes, Toyota prevents the recurrence of problems. This step is vital for fostering a culture of continuous improvement, as it ensures that lessons learned from each problem are incorporated into the broader system, leading to ongoing enhancements in efficiency and quality across the organization.

Conclusion

The 5 Why technique is a powerful tool that Toyota uses to maintain its high standards of efficiency and quality. By systematically identifying and addressing the root causes of problems, Toyota not only resolves immediate issues but also strengthens its processes to prevent future occurrences. The impact of this method is evident in Toyota's ability to consistently produce high-quality vehicles while continuously improving its operations. Whether you are in manufacturing or another industry, adopting the 5 Why approach can help you dig deeper into problems and create lasting solutions.

Unlock the power of structured problem-solving with SolvoNext PDCA. Implement proven methods like the 5 Whys to drive continuous improvement in your operations. Discover how SolvoNext PDCA can elevate your processes—start today!